Friday, September 2, 2011

Social Engineers Continue To Sexualize Children

Brandon Turbeville
September 2, 2011

It is true that a society which is in clear and steep decline inevitably loses all elements of its moral compass before its ultimate collapse. Both our own culture in the United States, as well as that of the rest of the Western World, are adequate proof of that.

Indeed, the depths of cultural, moral, and spiritual degradation we have allowed ourselves to sink to scarcely appears to have any limits. We have allowed ourselves to accept torture as a justified method of ensuring our “security.” We have allowed ourselves to accept the murder of 51 million babies sold to us under the guise of a “woman’s right to choose.”We are increasingly coming to accept the denial of healthcare services to the elderly under the justification that the costs are too high and that they aredraining away resources from those who are more deserving of them. We have accepted the slaughter ofmillions of innocent people in foreign wars resulting from a culture of fear, weakness, and intellectual laziness.

Unfortunately, all of these acts have been growing in its societal acceptability for some time with very little resistance to it among the general public.

However, through all of these engineered social changes and manipulated mass opinions, there was at least one shared value that did, at least up until this point, remain intact – that of an abhorrence of child molestation and pedophilia.

Unfortunately, one of the last strands of moral fiber left, the innocence of children and their protection from vampirical predators is now set to be removed from the national hive mind.

If the average American could slow down just a little bit, if they could turn off their televisions for only a second, they would see it coming as well. Absent the constant barrage of propaganda and programming, they would be able to see that there is a distinct increase in the attempts to sexualize young children and normalize pedophilia through the entertainment industry, scientific establishment, and mass media.

For instance, a recent article published in the UK’s Daily Mail entitled, “Modelling in her underwear at 12 and pregnant at 15 . . . and schoolgirl’s proud mother can’t wait for a new council house,” details the story of Soya Keaveney, the now-fifteen year old girl who has been modeling in her bikini since she was 12, and her mother, Janis Keaveney who has facilitated the modeling experience.

As Paul Sims writes for the Daily Mail, “Aged just 12, Soya was posing provocatively in a bikini for pictures her mother later posted on the internet in the belief it would launch the youngster’s modeling career.”

Janis Keaveney also allowed her daughter’s photographs to be published in Closer magazine in 2008. Under the headline, “My girl’s only 12 but she’s already dieting,” Soya posed in lacy underwear and a bikini.

The article says,
Soya had been going to discos at the age of seven and wearing make-up, mini dresses and revealing tops. By eight she was desperate for fame.
Aged 12, the youngster was exercising every day and never left the house without putting on eyeliner and mascara.
She had also started wearing padded bras, short skirts, cropped tops, high heels and fishnet tights.
There were nights out at under-18 discos and hours spent in front of the mirror getting herself ready in clothes regularly picked out by her mother.
One could no doubt fill pages with comments regarding the mental stability of the mother. However, while these comments would be justified, what is more shocking is the fact that the infrastructure that facilitated her pathetic and vicarious fantasies (or, at best, moral negligence) being realized through her daughter actually exists.

Keep in mind that there were photographers willing to take these photos. There were also magazines available to publish the girl’s photos, a move they certainly would not have taken unless these magazines were sure they would make some level of profit as a result of the publication. That is, of course, unless they had some kind of support from high places.

But the infrastructure of child sexuality in the UK goes a bit further than racy photos as another article in the Daily Mail, written by Tom Kelly, explains. Entitled “The Classes where children as young as THREE learn to pole dance,” details the dance studio classes that are popping up all over England for the purpose of teaching young girls, ages three to seven, to swing up and down poles and “moves including holding their legs in a V-shape while sliding down the pole.”

Under the guise of keeping the children fit and boosting their self-esteem, parents are able to pay a small fee at any number of “dance studios” with names such as “Little Spinners,” “Make Me Fabulous,” and “Trendy Monkeys.”

The latter specializes in children under 13 and seeks to “transform children with face masks, new hairstyles and lip gloss.” Kelly writes, “The pole dancing lessons take place in a room decorated with pink feather boas and sparkling mirrors. They are advertised on a website which also promotes adult lessons, features pictures of lingerie-clad women and describes pole dances as ‘sexy, relaxing, and invigorating.’”

Of course, the owner of one of the schools disagrees with the criticism she has received. She sees nothing wrong with her teaching young girls to simulate sex around a phallic symbol. After all, she claims she had to start the school out of demand from the children themselves – a rather familiar excuse that we have heard in the past from other questionable individuals.

“They wanted to join in because it is such fun. There is nothing sexual about it,” Miss Wilford says. “I am trying to remove the stigma from pole dancing and show that it actually helps children keep fit and learn balance much like gym classes.”

The girls, of course, learn fitness and balance in the same way that heroin abusers learn how to operate medical instruments. Indeed, if Miss Wilford truly believes there is nothing sexual about pole dancing, she might do well to explain the non-sexual aspect of it to those multitudes of men who waste a great deal of their money under the wrong impression.

Nevertheless, as appalling as these incidents are, the UK cannot be allowed the trophy in the contest of normalized pedophilia and sexualized children. The German government has even gone so far as to officially sanction it, along with incest, by issuing two booklets from the subsidiary of its Ministry for Family Affairs entitled “Love, Body, and Playing Doctor.”

These booklets, created and distributed by the German Federal Health Education Center (BZgA), are aimed at parents (in reference to children 1-3 years old in the first book, and 4-6 years old in the second book) andencourages parents to sexually massage the genitalia of their children.

In regards to children 1-3 years old, the first booklet reads, “Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex.”

It goes on to say, “The child touches all parts of their father’s body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same.”

The pamphlet also suggests that parents permit children “unlimited masturbation” and that “Children should learn that there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body.”

Of course, there is nothing wrong with a child learning about his/her body in the proper manner. Treating sexuality and the human body as if it were the plague is certainly not being suggested here. However, in the context of the rest of the booklet and the shocking statements made within it, one should also view these statements with serious concern.

Suggesting that a parent massage the genitalia of their children and then offering that children should learn that “there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body” appears to be merely a method of cover-up for sexual abuse than a means to open dialogue between parents and children in regards to their body.

Regardless, the fact is that this is an invaluable lesson if your goal is to create a generation of children who do not even recognize when they are being abused.

Indeed, the goal appears to be a complete normalization of pedophilia within the culture of the general public. Increasingly sexualized behavior of children in movies,television, and music is becoming more and more common. Children are now being paraded around as if they were adults and being treated as such by real adults. Reality TV shows depicting children dressed as fashion models and acting like “little divas” has become acceptable viewing in the United States.

Even the language being used to describe the disgusting individuals that engage in child molestation is being watered down by virtue of our obsession with political correctness. Pedophiles are now called “minor attracted individuals” and child molestation is now referred to in many circles as “intergenerational sex.”

But the normalization of pedophilia has, up until this point, always remained largely hidden.
Unfortunately, that is beginning to change. Never to be outdone on the road to cultural depravity, the United States now has a group of “mental health professionals” and other activists who are dedicated to removing pedophilia from the American Psychological Association’s (APA) list of mental illnesses known as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

The conference, which was scheduled to meet on August 17 in Baltimore, was made up of researchers from Harvard, John Hopkins University, University of Louisville, and the University of Illinois, as well as activists from the organization B4U-ACT, an group which is made up of pro-pedophile mental health professionals and other activists seeking to normalize the act of child molestation within the mental health community and society as a whole.

In all fairness, the conference is not funded or promoted by the US government. But it is important to keep in mind that many of those participating are most definitely part of the system and the establishment – particularly the mental health and the educational establishment. They are, after all, the “intellectuals” of society and those who are busy “educating” (more accurately described as “indoctrinating”) your children and America’s future leaders.

Not only does this speak to the fact that, once one moves up to a higher position in his/her field, pedophilia is much more acceptable than it is amongst the general populace (for now at least), it also represents an open stride toward normalizing as well as decriminalizing pedophilia in general and specifically removing its illegality in the eyes of the law.

This is because the US government, in its broad, overreaching and unconstitutional laws, takes the word of the APA to be fact, no matter how ridiculous its conclusions may be. The rights of the individual rarely, if ever, take precedence if they are even considered at all. As one child advocate put it, “It has been carried from the university to the law, going back to Kinsey.” This is true in many areas such as eugenics and other forms of quackery espoused by so-called intellectuals and academics.

The conference brochure states that the conference will look into “ways in which minor-attracted persons [pedophiles] can be involved in the DSM 5 revision process” and, as John Rossomando of the Daily Caller writes, “how the popular perceptions of pedophiles can be reframed to encourage tolerance.”

Rossomando continues, “B4U-ACT has been active attacking the APA’s definition of pedophilia in the run up to the conference, denouncing its description of ‘minor-attracted persons’ as ‘inaccurate’ and ‘misleading’ because the current DSM links pedophilia with criminality.”

In a July 25, 2011 press release for B4U-ACT, science director and pedophile Howard Kline stated, “It is based on data from prison studies, which completely ignore the existence of those who are law-abiding.”

In case Kline might have forgotten, pedophilia itself is a crime. So someone who is engaged in pedophilia cannot be law abiding.

Also, it should be made clear that calling Kline a pedophile is not an ad-hominem attack. That’s what he is. As he stated in his press release, “We can help them [the APA] because we are the people they are writing about.”

Indeed, B4U-ACT is made up of criminals, pedophiles, and other general miscreants. Unfortunately, so is academia and government. As conference panelist, Jacob Breslow, a graduate student of gender studies from the London School of Economics (big surprise there) wrote, “Allowing for a form of non-diagnosable minor attraction is exciting, as it creates a sexual or political identity by which activists, scholars, and clinicians can better understand Minor Attracted Persons.”

If you would like to understand more about “minor attracted persons,” better known as pedophiles or child molesters, you might find this video interesting.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.