Hillary Clinton Supported The TARP and The Banker Bailout

image source: The Daily Beast

Brandon Turbeville
Era Of Wisdom
BrandonTurbeville.com
February 3, 2016

If Clinton’s ties to Wall Street were not bad enough, one need only look to her Wall Street voting record to see the dividends such ties have paid to the American people. Clinton is, without a doubt, one of the most heavily-funded candidates by Wall Street in the 2016 elections and the Clinton machine has been so corrupt throughout the years that one would almost be tempted to wonder whether or not the millions of dollars flowing in to Hillary’s hands via Wall Street is what prompted her to promote such treachery or whether the money is simply payment for the treachery rendered. It’s a chicken or the egg conundrum, really.

Regardless, one need only look to Clinton’s record when it came to the TARP program and the infamous Banker Bailout of 2009 to see whose side Clinton comes down upon.

In 2009, as the banking industry had once again revealed itself as a perverted gambling casino of toxic nothingness and an enemy to both working people and first world living standards, the question put before Congress was whether or not to put the US government (meaning the American people) on the hook for Wall Street’s corrupt dealings and bad (though mostly coordinated and intentional) decisions.

While the American public has tended to be out to lunch on important issues, the overwhelming majority of Americans were still clearly opposed to the 2009 banker bailout. Of course, that didn’t stop the President, the Senate, or the House from supporting it.

Hillary Clinton: Fake As A Wedding Cake

Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
January 19, 2016

Hillary Clinton has long been known as a chameleon. Clinton, with the exception of some of her more onerous policies – i.e gun control, war, banker affiliation etc. – is willing to have one position on Monday and another one Monday afternoon when it comes to wedge issues and those discussions which are seen largely as belonging to a specific group of people. Thus, that position changes depending on what audience she is catering to. Clinton’s personality, tone, and presentation change with the audience.

While this is not surprising given that Clinton is a politician, what is surprising is that Clinton’s epic fails in her attempts to be portrayed as “just like the common man (or woman)” have not earned her more ridicule than they actually have. Indeed, it is surprising that Hillary at her most phony is still able to fool the members of the audience watching her speeches despite her poor attempts at mimicking the behavior, cadence, and colloquialisms of the “lower classes.”

Consider one of the most hilarious incidents of Hillary’s mimicking fails, a campaign trip to Kentucky where she attempted to pick up a southern accent mixed with black vernacular and colloquial speech, conveniently for an audience that was both southern and black. Clinton’s rendition of both of these styles was so terrible it should have made everyone in the room cringe. Clinton sounded neither black nor southern as she slashed and shrieked her way through a quote of James Cleveland’s “I Don’t Feel Noways Tired.”[1]

The 2015 Winner Of The Award For Reverse Excellence

Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
December 31, 2015

Toward the end of every year, it has become a Western tradition to initiate the proceedings of a “round up” or “best of” of the people, events, and products of the year and attempt to crown a number of individuals with awards for the most accomplished, best dressed, most influential, or most creative of that year. The world of politics and government is no different.

However, while politicians and government officials are awash with awards and backslapping trophies, there still exists no official award provided to them at the end of the year for their life’s accomplishments and those made over the past 12 months. It is clearly time to change this.

But what would such an award look like? We already have the Nobel Peace Prize, a perfect Orwellian award whose name says “peace” but is generally awarded to mass murderers, warmongers, and proponents of genocidal austerity. Unfortunately, we find the Nobel Prize is no longer able to provide us with the pride and confidence in the world’s leaders who are responsible for the killing of innocent people and the destruction of their livelihoods in the way that we desire. Unable to understand the concept of doublethink, the general public is confused by the use of the word “peace” in the title of the prize and thus they believe that the “peace” prize is actual a prize for peace. For that reason, they often see the recipients as weak and ineffectual despite their accomplishments.

So the award we need must have a title that sums up the true genuine accomplishments of the recipient while, at the same time, appealing to the sense of admiration we have for anyone in a position of authority and the abject fear we feel at the possibility of angering them.

Hillary Clinton’s Vaccine Propaganda

Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post
November 9, 2015

In stark contrast to candidate Clinton in 2008 when questions over the safety and effectiveness of vaccines were just coming to the political consciousness of the American people in large numbers, Hillary has now become a vocal cheerleader of Big Pharma and vaccinations.

While her opinion is odious enough on its face, it is quite the change from the opinion she held as a candidate in 2008 when she stated that there was the possibility that vaccines were linked to autism.

In fact, she wrote in a campaign questionnaire that she was committed to finding out the causes of autism, including “possible environmental causes like vaccines.”[1]

In 2015, however, when it became clear that questions surrounding vaccines was not going to remain merely a part of the “fringe” of society (among both the right and the left) alone and the propaganda campaign began full-steam ahead to eliminate any mass movement against the continued hiding of the dangers of vaccination, Clinton began showing her true colors, coming out in favor of the pro-vaccine crowd and insinuating that anyone who questions the safety or effectiveness of vaccines was a luddite and an anti-science crackpot.[2]

Clinton was one in a long line of presidential hopefuls who made sure to take part in the propaganda campaign against concerned parents, affected individuals, and informed citizens.

Hillary Clinton: The Killing Of Ghaddafi And The Destruction Of Libya

Brandon Turbeville

BrandonTurbeville.com

October 13, 2015

While Clinton’s demented reaction to Ghaddafi’s death was revealing, her actual contribution to it was not only immoral and illegal, it was treasonous. 

Remember, it was Hillary Clinton, along with her State Department staff such as Susan Rice and Victoria Nuland who were out in front building up the case for war against Libya, a “UN Resolution," and support for the terrorists attempting to overthrow the Libyan leader. 

In fact, in an article entitled “Hillary’s War: How Conviction Replaced Skepticism In Libya Intervention,” the Washington Post’s Joby Warrick describes how Clinton provided yeomen’s service in the effort to build an “international coalition” against Libya and Ghaddafi and how she worked overtime to see to it that the nation with the highest living standards in Africa was reduced to a burning desert of rubble and savagery.[1]

Even the Huffington Post was forced to admit that Hillary Clinton was one of the main forces promoting the war in Libya, while also fairly pointing out that Clinton was one of many in the US State Department and other governing bodies who supported the same.[2]

Clinton would stop at no lengths to push the United States into yet another war. Clinton would even go so far as to give support to the propaganda line that Ghaddafi was using rape and sexual violence to intimidate and oppress Libyan women.[3] 

Hillary Clinton: We Came. We Saw. He Died.

Brandon Turbeville

BrandonTurbeville.com

October 2, 2015

Perhaps one of the most sadistic and psychopathic displays of an American official, Hillary Clinton’s cackling response to a question regarding the death of Ghaddafi and the US role in the destruction of Libya certainly deserves honorable mention.[1]

Clinton’s remark was a paraphrase of a quote from Julius Caesar after he concluded his war with Pharnaces II of Pontus: “Veni, vidi, vici” (“I came, I saw, I conquered’).[2]

Ghaddafi’s murder had just taken place with the Libyan leader – a true leader in the fight against Islamic terrorism and who had increased the living standards of the average Libyan to some of the highest in Africa – being sodomized with a bayonet, beaten, and eventually executed.[3]

The statement, along with her signature cackle revealed the depths of depravity in which Clinton dwells as well as a glimpse of her obvious psychosis and psychopathy.[4]

Please see the video at this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y

Brandon Turbeville's new book, The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President is available in three different formats: Hardcopy (available here), Amazon Kindle for only .99 (available here), and a Free PDF Format (accessible free from his website,BrandonTurbeville.com).

Introduction To The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President

Brandon Turbeville
BrandonTurbeville.com
September 24, 2015

Among the numerous political candidates who have thrown their hat in the ring for the position of figurehead and front man for the US oligarchy, few can actually be distinguished from one another on even the smallest issues. Once again, Americans are reminded that the process of American elections is nothing but a theatre – a bread and circus for those with an intellectual tinge.

Indeed, not a single candidate in the race is truly discernible from any other and, like past presidential races, it is clear that Americans are being given the chance only to choose the brand and presentation of oligarchical rule and not the chance to remove themselves from the oligarchical yoke.

There is, however, one candidate that is doing her best to rise above them all – Hillary Clinton.



This book began as merely part of a project that was never fully realized – a comprehensive series of articles written about each presidential candidate from both major parties detailing why voters should refuse to back these candidates with their vote. It was an attempt to help tear away the veil of political smokescreen that so many Americans fall into every four years. But, when I first conceived of an article listing reasons why any sane voter should stay far away from Hillary Clinton, the task was quickly dispelled from the possibility of being a comprehensive work due to the fact that the crimes of Hillary Clinton are far too numerous to mention, even in an article of unwieldy length.

Truth on the Tracks with Brandon Turbeville - September 21, 2015

Truth on the Tracks with Brandon Turbeville - September 21, 2015

Brandon announces his new book The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. He also discusses the European immigration crisis (who is behind it and why), the solutions to the crisis, the potential for WW3 in Syria, and the recent Japanese decision to return to the use of its military for imperialist purposes.

ACCESS THE PROGRAM HERE

ACCESS THE TRUTH ON THE TRACKS ARCHIVES HERE



Buy the hardcopy book here

Buy the Amazon Kindle Version here

Download the free PDF here

The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President

BrandonTurbeville.com
Activist Post
September 21, 2015

Activist Post writer, Brandon Turbeville, has just released his seventh book: The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Brandon is known for his detailed research, principally in the area of Geopolitics, color revolutions, the Middle East and, specifically, Syria. In his new book, however, Turbeville lists at least 36 aspects of Clinton’s career in an attempt to demonstrate why Hillary Clinton should never be considered as a serious candidate for President.

Turbeville is apt to point out that the book is not entirely comprehensive, stating that it could have been twice as long since the list of Hillary Clinton’s crimes are so vast that an author would spend years compiling them all together. But the goal, Turbeville says, was to get the book out before the primaries in order to try and head off what he deems a “worst case scenario” before it had a chance to grow out of control.

In his introduction to the book, Turbeville writes:

It is vitally important to understand that this book is by no means an endorsement of any other candidate in the political race for the Presidency. It is merely designed to inform and educate. Until Americans are truly aware of the issues they face and the legitimate solutions necessary to repair the American economy, restore living standards, return civil liberties and the like, America will be given false choices like Hillary Clinton versus the Republican nomination.